Marco Polo

For a guy who claimed to spend 17 years in China as a confidant of Kublai Khan, Marco Polo left a surprisingly skimpy paper trail.

Each day I post a new Online MCAT CARS Passage. This is for anyone who wants to practice for the Critical Analysis and Reasoning Section.

Every article is selected to meet the AAMC MCAT criteria for MCAT CARS.

Subscribe by email to receive a new free practice passage each morning.

August 2, 2017 – Free MCAT CARS Practice

Question: What is your summary of the author’s main ideas. Post your own answer in the comments before reading those made by others.

For a guy who claimed to spend 17 years in China as a confidant of Kublai Khan, Marco Polo left a surprisingly skimpy paper trail. No Asian sources mention the footloose Italian. The only record of his 13th-century odyssey through the Far East is the hot air of his own Travels, which was actually an “as told to” penned by a writer of romances. But a set of 14 parchments, now collected and exhaustively studied for the first time, give us a raft of new stories about Polo’s journeys and something notably missing from his own account: maps.

If genuine, the maps would show that Polo recorded the shape of the Alaskan coast—and the strait separating it from Asia—four centuries before Vitus Bering, the Danish explorer long considered the first European to do so. Perhaps more important, they suggest Polo was aware of the New World two centuries before Columbus.

“It would mean that an Italian got knowledge of the west coast of North America or he heard about it from Arabs or Chinese,” says Benjamin B. Olshin, a historian of cartography whose book, The Mysteries of the Marco Polo Maps, is out in November from the University of Chicago Press. “There’s nothing else that matches that, if that’s true.”

But as Olshin is first to admit, the authenticity of the ten maps and four texts is hardly settled. The ink remains untested, and a radiocarbon study of the parchment of one key map—the only one subjected to such analysis—dates the sheepskin vellum to the 15th or 16th century, a sign the map is at best a copy. Another quandary is that Polo himself wrote nothing of personal maps or of lands beyond Asia, though he did once boast: “I did not tell half of what I saw.”

The parchments came to America in the steamer trunks of an enigmatic Italian immigrant named Marcian Rossi. Rossi landed in the United States as a teenager in 1887 and later told a historian that the documents were passed down through patrician ancestors from an admiral to whom Polo had entrusted them. The mustachioed, bow-tie-fancying Rossi was a father of six who worked as a tailor in San Jose, California. He was also a charming, cigar-puffing raconteur, who despite little schooling wrote a sci-fi thriller, A Trip to Mars.

Might Rossi have conjured a Polo fantasy, too? “He certainly was enough of a character,” says his great-grandson, Jeffrey Pendergraft, a Houston energy executive who is custodian of the family papers. But neither Pendergraft nor cartographic experts suspect Rossi of forging the maps. “The incredible amount of knowledge in them about a whole variety of subjects—I would be very skeptical that my great-grandfather possessed,” Pendergraft says.

When Rossi donated the palimpsest “Map with Ship” to the Library of Congress in the 1930s, even the FBI was stumped. The agency’s analysis, requested by the library and signed by J. Edgar Hoover, was mum on the question of authenticity.

One reason the parchments have languished since then is their idiosyncrasy. They tell of people and places absent not just from Polo’s narrative but from known history. And they’re an awkward fit for the era’s known map styles—Portolan sailing charts, the grids and projections of Ptolemy, and the medieval schematics known as mappae mundi.

The parchments bear inscriptions, some cryptic, in Italian, Latin, Arabic and Chinese. Olshin, a professor at the University of the Arts in Philadelphia, who spent more than 13 years researching and writing his new book, is the first scholar to fully decode and translate the maps and to trace Rossi’s ancestry, with some success, back to Polo’s Venice. One of Olshin’s most tantalizing finds are allusions to “Fusang,” an obscure fifth-century Chinese name for a “land across the ocean” that some scholars now contend was America.

History says little about Polo’s three daughters. (He had no sons.) But Fantina, Bellela and Moreta have star turns here, signing their names to some of the parchments and claiming to have drawn them from their father’s “letters,” apparently after his death. Bellela writes of hitherto untold encounters with a Syrian navigator, a band of lance-toting women in ermine pelts and people on a peninsula “twice as far from China” who wear sealskin, live on fish and make their houses “under the earth.”

Travels made Polo an instant celebrity after his return to Venice, both for his descriptions of faraway lands and for what his countrymen suspected was wild fabrication. His daughters may have plunged back into their father’s notes in hopes of securing his reputation, surmises Stanley Chojnacki, a University of North Carolina expert on gender relations in 14th-century Venice, and “to claim by reason of defending him a certain measure of respectability and status and importance themselves.”

Adapted from smithsonianmag.


Leave a comment below with what you understood to be the author’s main ideas. Ask about this daily passage in office hours/workshops for help.

Subscribe to my Daily CARS mailing list by entering your email.

The full list of daily articles is available here.

Have a great day.
Jack Westin
MCAT CARS Instructor.
Contact Information


  1. new parchments = maps + Polo before Columbus, authenticity debatable, Polo’s daughters involved with parchments + wanted father to be reputable


  2. Polo’s explorative history comes into question over parchments.


  3. There is questions about the legitimacy of Polo’s travels. Some evidence suggesting it is true, other evidence suggesting it is false.


  4. Need maps may support Polo being 1st to discover America. However, speculation exists regarding fabrication, authenticity and authorship.


  5. New parchments found = new info about Polo’s journeys, the authenticity of the new documents = questionable.


  6. MIP: Polo predicted new world through maps. His maps authenticity is in ?. Rossi maps=real


  7. New Maps found = shows new info about polos journey. Authenticity of documents= debatable.


  8. The author’s main idea was to analyze and bring forth information about Polo’s journey and maps – also to explain the debate (different views) over the authenticity of the maps Polo had that showed he traveled many places before other explorers.


  9. New works about Marco Polo’s travels have been discovered, but their credibility has been doubted. These new maps could have Polo discovering the New World 200 years before Columbus.


  10. Map discovery indicates Polo may have known about the New World–a breakthrough discovery.


  11. Recent documents that would expand the history of Marco Polo has been found, but it has yet to be confirmed.


  12. Goal: To discuss that it is unsettled much of the world Marco Polo may or may not have explored. Could have preceded Columbus in seeing the New World, or descriptions could be fantasies. Could not have written for all Marco Polo saw. Author tone: neutral


  13. Polo’s maps were seen as not authentic. Rossi brought the maps to America. Polo’s daughters inscribed maps.


  14. Parchments of Polo’s accounts + maps recently discovered; maps highlight Polo’s knowledge and explorations; map authenticity = questionable


  15. MIP: Polo’s parchment’s reveal new info + question of their authenticity (brought by Rossi)


  16. MP leaves maps (by Rossi) and the authenticity was suspected. MP’s daughters defended for MP’s reputation of traveling to far-east based on his notes.


  17. Marco Polo did not leave much historical data besides his 14 parchments and maps.The wondered if the maps were real of authentic and most of all the passage is about the maps and parchments.


  18. New evidence -> polo made maps & discovered america, may be fake.
    Daughters support view for reputation.


  19. MI: MP left little physical evidence/supporting witnesses about his claims…. If genuine maps would lend to “some” of his claims…

    (For every claim supporting MP their is always evidence of doubt of that claim…. I think this points to the authors true feelings about MP)


Leave a Reply