Marrying Philosophers

It is said that on a trip to the US in the 1920s a German sociologist was astonished at the domestic arrangements of his American colleagues.

Each day I post a new Online MCAT CARS Passage. This is for anyone who wants to practice for the Critical Analysis and Reasoning Section.

Every article is selected to meet the AAMC MCAT criteria for MCAT CARS.

Subscribe by email to receive a new free practice passage each morning.

August 12, 2017 – Free MCAT CARS Practice

Question: What is your summary of the author’s main ideas. Post your own answer in the comments before reading those made by others.

It is said that on a trip to the US in the 1920s a German sociologist was astonished at the domestic arrangements of his American colleagues. How can you get any serious work done, he asked, without servants? The duties of a spouse and parent apparently do not sit well with deep thought and research, unless eased by paid help.

This makes me wonder whether “parentism” might be a problem to consider alongside sexism, at least in certain branches of academia. The two often go together, but they need not. Consider the student parlour game of puzzling over who among the major philosophical thinkers had a conventional home life.

In the ancient Greek world, Socrates was married with children but never got round to writing anything down. Plato, as far as we know, never married. Aristotle did marry, and one of his major works, The Nicomachean Ethics, is named after his son. But in later centuries the record is astonishing.

St Augustine (“grant me chastity, but not yet”) fathered an illegitimate child, but then became a celibate priest. Aquinas and the philosophers of the middle ages were all churchmen. In the 17th and 18th centuries, virtually all of the canonical figures were domestically unconventional. Hobbes, Locke, Hume, Adam Smith, Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, Kant and Bentham all went unmarried. Bishop Berkeley married late but had no children. Jean-Jacques Rousseau eventually married his lover Thérèse Levasseur, but abandoned all of his five children to foundling homes. This did not stop him writing a treatise, Emile, on the proper upbringing of children.

Closer to our own time, John Stuart Mill married late in life and had no children of his own. Schopenhauer, Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Sartre and Wittgenstein were all unmarried and childless. Marx gave up philosophy, turning to economics and politics, when his children were still young.

There are exceptions. Hegel married and had children. And in the 20th century AJ Ayer and Betrand Russell brought up the averages by marrying lavishly, though reproducing modestly. But it is a remarkable tradition.

What about the major women philosophers? Of those who are widely known, Mary Wollstonecraft produced her major works before producing her children, and tragically died from complications after the birth of her second child, who would become Mary Shelley. Simone de Beauvoir, Hannah Arendt, Simone Weil and Iris Murdoch, were all childless.

What explains this extraordinary correlation? It could be pure coincidence, but other hypotheses press for consideration. One is that the sheer oddity of philosophers makes them unsuitable life partners. Another is that domestic bliss dulls the philosophical edge. A third is that the problem lies in the nature of the deepest, most fundamental, philosophical work. If genius is “the infinite capacity for taking pains”, it wouldn’t seem to leave much time for anything else.

Nevertheless, few are on the level of Spinoza or Kierkegaard. For ordinary mortals our research requires only a finite capacity for taking pains, which ought to be compatible with a normal home life. In fact, in a recent survey in my faculty, although many people report that they struggle to achieve an acceptable life-work balance, those caring for children seem to do better than those who are not. And this makes sense. If you are looking after your children it puts your academic work into perspective. Maybe it isn’t the most important thing in the world after all.

The trouble is that if you don’t think your research and writing are the most important thing, at least in your own world, you probably won’t do as much of it as you could. And this is how the academic careers of parents, especially mothers, can stall. Once upon a time, we would have said: “That’s the choice you make”. Now we know that there is such a thing as “indirect discrimination”. We need to define a new model of academic progression that is fair to everyone. And a start would be to make advancement dependent on what academics do during normal working hours, rather than in their evenings and weekends.

Adapted from The Guardian.

Review

Leave a comment below with what you understood to be the author’s main ideas. Ask about this daily passage in office hours/workshops for help.

Subscribe to my Daily CARS mailing list by entering your email.

The full list of daily articles is available here.

Full MCAT CARS Practice Exams.

Have a great day.
Jack Westin
MCAT CARS Instructor.
Contact Information

 

13 Comments


  1. How philosophers struggled for work like balance and whether modern work life balance is really that bad.

    Reply

  2. Author examines largely historical trend that the best philosophers, both men and women, had unconventional or absent family lives. Considers three possibilities, although muses on final one that it is time that philosopher-parents must find a balance with. Their limited success may be due to the fact that advancement often requires nights and weekends.

    Reply

  3. Given academic work isn’t the center and children are a new system has to be put into place. Philosophy extremes are correlated to not having children for 3 reasons.

    Reply

  4. There is a correlation between the great philosophers who do not have children and their popularity.

    Reply

  5. philosophers = childless, need new model for academic progression

    Reply

  6. Philosophers = often childless because of 3 reasons. (P8).
    Author’s goal: to develop a new model would be compatible provide balance between home life & academic life for the philosophers

    Reply

  7. Many philosophers do not marry or do not have children.
    Family life does harm to academic achievement.
    The author advocates for a fair eval on the academic progression.

    Reply

  8. The author is arguing that a parent should not be expected or judged based on the work or lack of work during off-hours.

    Reply

  9. Many philosophers = unmarried and childless. Hard to find life-work balance. New model of academic progression needed.

    Reply

  10. The authors purpose was to show all angles of the argument that succesful philosophers remain unmarried and without children. He lists those who support this theory and then names a few exceptions. His overall argument is to propose a changed academic system in which this work life balance can be achieved and allow parents to achieve full potential in their academic careers.

    Reply

  11. A lot of famous philosophers had an unconventional home life. The author hints that this may be because those with children will no longer see philosophy as the most important thing in life. Connection to modern academia.

    Reply

  12. MI: Philosophy ≠ Family….. But we should change that…. The model does need to change…

    Reply

  13. Interesting how many philosophers don’t have children and/or are not married. It could be coincidence or other theories like genius takes up all resources, makes you an unsuitable partner, etc.

    Reply

Leave a Reply