Sacre

Each day I post a new MCAT CARS Passage. This is for anyone who wants to practice for the CARS Section.

Every article is selected to meet the AAMC MCAT criteria for CARS.

Subscribe by email to receive a new practice passage each morning.

April 24, 2017 – MCAT CARS Passage

Question: What is your summary of the author’s main ideas. Post your own answer in the comments before reading those made by others.

Igor Stravinksy’s “The Rite of Spring” (“Le Sacre du printemps”) caused a scandal when it premiered in Paris in 1913. It began, as no other composition ever had, on a high bassoon that weirdly descended the scale. The piece was ferocious, with odd rhythms and an apparent irreverence for melody. It was accompanied by Vaslav Nijinsky’s angular, confrontational choreography for Sergei Diaghilev’s Ballets Russes, which somehow completed the unwelcome package.
Stravinsky famously said he was simply “the vessel through which `Le Sacre’ passed”. The thing itself, however, had the effect of making many in that first Paris audience feel ill. Nothing like it had ever been seen or heard before. Yet the score has since become a fairly standard part of an orchestra’s repertoire. It is fantastically percussive and, in its tonal slides and unexpected instrumental phrases, still strange on the ear. Indeed, many say it is too complex to share the stage. The story it was first created to tell—of a virgin girl who must be sacrificed to save the earth—is enough to daunt many choreographers. That has not, however, stopped some from trying to harness the work.

Pina Bausch, a groundbreaking German choreographer who died in 2009, set a high bar with her “Frühlingsopfer” in 1975. Kenneth MacMillan, Maurice Béjart and Michael Clark also had striking versions to their names. But for the piece’s 100th anniversary, it seemed a new creation was called for. Michel Franck, director of Paris’s Théâtre Champs-Elysées, where “Rite” first premiered, tapped Sasha Waltz, another innovative German choreographer, for the honour. Her “Sacre”, first performed in 2013 to acclaim, will have its London premiere at Sadler’s Wells on November 11th.
“I felt it was a huge responsibility to create a new `Sacre’,” Ms Waltz says. “The weight of history” is inescapable when re-making Stravinsky’s classic, she admits. The staging would also mark the 20th anniversary of her Berlin-based dance company, which upped the stakes. Choreographing the work took about a year. Valery Gergiev conducted the first performance of “Sacre” at the Mariinsky Theatre—with the Mariinsky’s ballet dancers—in St Petersburg in May 2013, and then in Paris with Ms Waltz’s own troupe two weeks later.

Performing a brand-new piece with completely different sets of performers a mere weeks apart was dizzying. Two cultures were at work. The Mariinsky dancers are a classical troupe, with the strict discipline that ballet involves. Ms Waltz approaches dance more fluidly, seeking dancers for her company who have tremendous athletic and expressive skills but little or no classical training. She argues that people who can move well and imaginatively can create genuine, compelling dance theatre.

While in St Petersburg Ms Waltz communicated a certain methodological freedom. “The Mariinsky dancers really opened up and took to my language,” Ms Waltz recalls. “The `Sacre’ done by my group is wilder and rawer. But the choreography for both is the same.” Throughout, 28 dancers collide, intersect and then break apart with lyrical intensity. They perform against a bare stage and in simple, flowing costumes. Yet a century on, Ms Waltz has ensured her “Rite” still has the power to shock: the elected victim who must dance her way to death is stripped naked.

At the start of the 21st century, Sasha Waltz was the sexiest dance-maker in Europe. Her ingenious, and often very nude, trilogy—“Körper”, “S” and “noBody”, a spectacular investigation into the nature, needs and fragilities of the human body—was one of the most exciting mixes of surrealist theatre and edgy choreography in modern dance. She used objects and textures, such as plates, old clothes, paint and skis, for her dancers to play and interact with. Her performers spoke and argued, ran and jumped. Everything on stage looked like an obstacle course, yet the choreography somehow cohered.
“Sacre” is uncluttered. The Waltz signature is all there, with highly physical group formations and sudden, sharp changes. But for all its familiarity, it is also very new. “Every piece I do,” she says, “has its own colour. I wanted to make this one neither too `steppy’, nor too floaty and free. The ensemble is large, yet Stravinsky’s score is so precise and rhythmically compact. The dancers really needed something to hold on to.”

Adapted from Economist.

Review

Leave a comment below with what you understood to be the author’s main ideas. Ask about this daily passage in office hours/workshops for help.

Subscribe to my Daily CARS mailing list by entering your email.

The full list of daily articles is available here.

This was an article on Music.

Have a great day.
Jack Westin
MCAT CARS Instructor.
Contact Information

25 Comments


  1. MI=Waltz creates new Sacre 100 years later, positive

    Reply

  2. With the use of her ingenious and colorful choreography, Waltz accomplished a difficult feat, successfully remastered Stravinsky’s “Sacre,” a performance once despised but now revered.

    Reply

  3. Strav’s score = routine + not liked, something new needed (Waltz), Waltz’s new score similar yet impressive

    Reply

  4. Following the footsteps of Igor Starvinsky and Pina Bausch, Sasha Waltz recreated her own version of ‘Sacre’ with powerful choreography and ensemble.

    Reply

  5. MIP: new Rite = still shocking; familiar and new elements

    Reply

  6. MIP: Waltz revision of Sacre = same choreography but added taste; tone = neutral

    Reply

  7. MI: For the 100th Anniversary, a new version of the ‘Rite’ remains just and shocking as the original.

    Reply

  8. sacre = New creation by Sash Walz = sexiest, author = positive

    Reply

  9. MI: Sacre at first viewed negatively changes made and then viewed positively

    Reply

  10. Sacre = an odd + not-well-received piece when first performed = Waltz tried to recreate it with her touch (more modern, sexy, fluid, cohered)

    Reply

  11. Waltz = recreated Sacre; work = bad at first + accepted later

    Reply

  12. Sacre = initially not well received, often replicated
    Waltz – replicated Sacre well
    AO – Author thinks Waltz performance is exciting/sexy

    Reply

  13. New Sacre created by Sasha Waltz.

    Reply

  14. ROS= unwelcome+ ill feelings @ first
    ROS= recreated by Waltz (more fluid, diff staging)+ but still shock worthy
    author= + Waltz

    Reply

  15. Initial Sacre= scandal +ill making, New Sacre= sharp changes + rhythmically similar –> well received (AU)

    Reply

  16. ROS= nothing like it+ underwhelming + recreated= same choreography and added own feel ( Walter)

    Reply

  17. Sacre = huge responsibility (waltz)

    Reply

  18. difference between two types of dances; Waltz’s expressive dance = good theatre

    Reply

  19. MI1: o.g. sacre = scandel + odd
    MI2: o.g. Sacre = the standard
    MI3: new sacre made by Waltz = unique + uncluttered

    Reply

  20. MIP: Waltz’s remake of RS has its unique style.
    Tone: neutral

    Reply

  21. Rite of spring= daunting and ferocious
    Waltz : harnesses it = ingenious

    Reply

  22. MIP: RS=odd, challenging; Waltz’s=best, freedom + methodological.

    Reply

  23. History has shown that the initial “Rite” created an uproar by shocking the community who saw the performance. Now, as the 100th anniversary, Waltz is challenged by creating her own version of the “Sacre” that can still penetrate the audience leaving them with a sense of shock. With Waltz raw and physical style, yet mixing with traditional ballet, will try manage to accomplish such feat.

    Reply

  24. Sacre = weird/untraditional
    Waltz’s take = dynamic/authentic = best

    Reply

Leave a Reply